Summary of the whole post is at the bottom of the page for a quick read
The Start
Before Taiwan became the beating heart of the global tech economy, before its name was etched into the circuitry of iPhones, data centers, and AI servers, it was a small island looking for a future beyond textiles and assembly lines. In the 1980s, Taiwan’s economy was rising, but its industrial base still revolved around low-cost manufacturing. The question looming over its future was simple but urgent: What would come next?
The answer began with a man who had spent most of his career outside of Taiwan. Morris Chang, born in mainland China and educated at MIT and Stanford, had made his name in the United States, working at Texas Instruments for nearly 25 years. There, he rose from engineer to senior executive, overseeing semiconductor manufacturing with a calm mastery of both science and strategy. But after being passed over for the top job, Chang left the company in the early 1980s. Around the same time, the Taiwanese government was searching for a visionary to lead its technology ambitions. They didn’t just want an expert; they wanted someone who could build an industry from the ground up. They offered Chang the opportunity to lead the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) and, later, to launch a new kind of company, one that would take a radical approach to chipmaking.
That company, founded in 1987, was the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, TSMC. Its business model was as audacious as it was unproven. Unlike Intel, IBM, or Texas Instruments, TSMC wouldn’t design chips at all. It would simply manufacture them on behalf of others. At the time, this was unheard of. Chipmaking was an all-or-nothing business: design, fabricate, test, and sell. The idea of divorcing design from manufacturing seemed inefficient or even foolish to many. But Morris Chang saw something others didn’t: a new wave of designers, small, innovative firms, who could create brilliant chip architectures but couldn’t afford billion-dollar factories. These companies needed a partner. TSMC would become that silent force behind the curtain.
Making Their Path
In the early days, no one outside Taiwan paid much attention. With a single fabrication facility in Hsinchu and a modest team of engineers, TSMC was just a blip on the global radar. But it had something the industry hadn’t yet seen: singular focus. While other companies balanced R&D, branding, and product development, TSMC put all its energy into one thing: becoming the most reliable, precise, and advanced chip manufacturer in the world. That focus began to pay off as the tech boom of the 1990s took hold. Fabless chip companies like Broadcom, Qualcomm, and NVIDIA began to emerge, and they needed high-quality manufacturing partners to scale. TSMC didn’t just meet the moment; it quietly defined it.
While competitors like Intel were still keeping their fabs proprietary, TSMC was opening its doors. One by one, the industry’s most ambitious designers knocked, and TSMC delivered. Its factories, or “fabs,” became temples of precision, cleanrooms filled with robotic arms, extreme ultraviolet lithography machines, and engineers operating at the atomic scale. The company advanced quickly through the hierarchy of chipmaking: 180 nanometers, 90, 28. Each leap represented a milestone in computing power and efficiency, and TSMC was often first across the line.
As the 2000s unfolded, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company quietly became the axis on which the global tech world turned. With each new generation of chips, smaller, faster, and more power-efficient, TSMC pulled further ahead. It didn’t trumpet its advances with flashy events or sprawling product lines. Instead, it let its partners do the talking: NVIDIA, Qualcomm, AMD, each reliant on TSMC’s ability to turn their ideas into physical reality. The company transformed itself from a niche manufacturing partner into something far more critical: one of the most advanced foundries on Earth.
Node by Node
By the early 2010s, the semiconductor landscape was quietly shifting, and TSMC was pulling ahead at a remarkable pace. Many of its competitors faced significant setbacks that thinned the field. GlobalFoundries, once a promising contender with deep industry backing, struggled to keep pace technologically. After attempting to push beyond the 14-nanometer node, it eventually conceded the race for cutting-edge manufacturing and refocused on more mature process technologies and specialty chips. Similarly, UMC, another Taiwanese foundry, chose to step back from competing at the leading edge and concentrated on serving more established, less demanding markets. These moves left TSMC as the clear frontrunner in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, reinforcing its position as the go-to partner for the world’s most innovative chip designers.
Meanwhile, Intel, long regarded as the uncontested king of semiconductor manufacturing, began to experience troubling delays and internal challenges. The company’s repeated setbacks in transitioning to 10-nanometer technology, caused by yield problems and complex process issues, slowed its momentum and allowed TSMC to gain ground. Intel’s internal disarray, combined with a more rigid business model focused on integrated device manufacturing, contrasted sharply with TSMC’s agile foundry approach. What was once unimaginable started to take shape: the very company that defined chipmaking for decades began outsourcing its most advanced chip production to TSMC. This dramatic reversal underscored not just TSMC’s technical excellence but also a broader industry shift toward specialization and collaboration.
While others slipped or stalled, TSMC surged ahead. But what set the company apart was its unwavering focus. The fabs in Hsinchu became cathedrals of repetition and refinement, executing some of the most complex manufacturing steps in human history with almost metronomic reliability. This relentless forward motion began to attract not just small, fabless startups but industry giants. Apple, impressed with TSMC’s ability to deliver at scale, moved production of its A-series chips away from Samsung, starting with the A8. Soon after, others followed. AMD entrusted TSMC with its comeback-era Ryzen and EPYC processors. NVIDIA relied on TSMC for key GPU generations like Pascal and Volta. Qualcomm began manufacturing flagship Snapdragon chips there. And companies like Broadcom, MediaTek, Xilinx, and Marvell also leaned in, not just because TSMC had the capacity, but because it had the confidence to deliver on roadmap after roadmap. Designing a cutting-edge chip is a multibillion-dollar risk. These firms didn’t just need a foundry that could promise the future; they needed one that could build it.
Geopolitical Tensions
But as the chips became smaller, the stakes became bigger. TSMC was no longer just a business story; it was a geopolitical one. The company's headquarters in Hsinchu, once an obscure science park, now sat at the epicenter of a brewing global competition for technological supremacy. By the late 2010s, the company was producing over 90% of the world’s most advanced chips, the kind used not just in smartphones and data centers, but in fighter jets, satellites, and advanced artificial intelligence systems. At the leading edge of semiconductor technology, 7 nanometers, then 5, now 3, there was no substitute for TSMC.
The rest of the world had come to a stark realization: while chip design had gone global, chip manufacturing had quietly concentrated in a single, politically sensitive location. Taiwan, an island claimed by China but governed as a democratic republic, held the keys to the digital economy. In an era of rising tensions between the United States and China, TSMC had become the world's most valuable choke point.
The implications were enormous. For the U.S., which had long relied on TSMC to manufacture Apple’s iPhone chips and NVIDIA’s GPUs, Taiwan’s security became a matter of economic and national interest. Meanwhile, China, eager to reduce its dependence on foreign technology, poured billions into domestic semiconductor initiatives but found itself years behind TSMC in both technology and manufacturing scale. As trade wars flared and export controls tightened, semiconductors became the new oil, the invisible resource every nation needed to power its future.
Expanding
To reduce risk and ease growing political pressure, TSMC began to expand abroad. In 2020, it announced a landmark investment in Arizona, committing $12 billion to build its first advanced chipmaking facility in the United States. The move was part of a broader realignment of global supply chains, driven by the realization that the world’s most critical technology was heavily concentrated in a geopolitically sensitive region. The U.S. government, increasingly alarmed by its dependence on overseas manufacturing for everything from smartphones to military hardware, backed the project with funding, policy support, and strategic urgency. Soon after, TSMC announced additional projects in Japan and Germany, forming a trio of flagship fabs meant to bring chip production closer to major markets and calm growing fears of a future supply disruption.
But building a fab isn’t just about breaking ground and installing tools. TSMC’s ecosystem in Hsinchu had been cultivated over three decades: engineers trained in atomic-level precision, local suppliers calibrated to its needs, a logistics network optimized to feed its fabs with near-zero downtime. In Arizona, those advantages didn’t yet exist. Talent shortages, cultural and operational friction, and construction delays soon followed. U.S. chip engineers were skilled, but far fewer had experience with cutting-edge nodes like 5nm or 3nm. Subcontractors unfamiliar with TSMC’s famously rigid standards had to adapt quickly or risk falling behind. As one executive put it, trying to duplicate Taiwan’s chipmaking infrastructure abroad was like trying to transplant a rainforest, possible, but fragile, and never quite the same.
To overcome these challenges, TSMC has invested heavily in developing local talent through partnerships with universities, specialized training programs, and by bringing experienced engineers from Taiwan to mentor new teams. Simultaneously, the company is working to build a localized supply chain by collaborating closely with U.S. suppliers to meet its exacting standards. TSMC is also adapting its project management and quality control processes to fit the different regulatory and cultural environment in Arizona, striving to maintain the precision and rigor that define its fabs. While acknowledging that no single overseas site can fully replicate the unique ecosystem of Hsinchu, TSMC aims to build a resilient global network of fabs that ensures both technological leadership and supply chain security.
How Chips Are Made
At its core, every modern chip begins as a flat, gleaming disc of silicon no thicker than a coin. From that blank slate, TSMC manufactures some of the most complex objects humans have ever created, chips containing tens of billions of microscopic transistors, each acting as a tiny on-off switch to move electrical signals at blinding speed. To build them, the wafer must pass through hundreds of steps across several weeks, where layers of material are added, etched, polished, and patterned with atomic precision. The crown jewel of this process is lithography: a form of nanoscale stenciling that uses highly focused beams of light to draw the circuitry layer by layer. At the cutting edge, TSMC uses extreme ultraviolet (EUV) light, generated by firing lasers at molten tin droplets, to project circuit patterns that are narrower than a virus. The machines that make this possible are built almost exclusively by ASML, a Dutch company that produces the only EUV lithography systems in the world. Each machine costs over $150 million and takes months to assemble, with critical components coming from suppliers across Europe, the U.S., and Japan. Once delivered, these massive tools must operate inside cleanrooms thousands of times purer than a hospital operating room. This is not just manufacturing, it’s atomic choreography, powered by a global supply chain and executed with relentless precision in the heart of TSMC’s fabs.
At the 3-nanometer node, a single fingernail-sized chip can contain over 100 billion transistors, each one perfectly placed, aligned, and functioning in harmony. A tiny vibration, a particle of dust, or a calibration error measured in fractions of a nanometer can ruin the batch. Yield, how many working chips come out of a single wafer, is everything. To understand why this level of precision matters, it helps to know Moore’s Law, an idea proposed in 1965 by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, who observed that the number of transistors on a chip was doubling roughly every two years. This doubling didn’t just mean more power; it meant faster processors, cheaper electronics, and a consistent rhythm of progress in computing. For decades, Moore’s Law became a kind of industry compass. But as engineers reached the limits of physics, that pace began to slow. TSMC, more than any other company, has kept it alive, not through theory or prediction, but by mastering the invisible: stacking atoms, guiding photons, and building the future layer by layer, with astonishing consistency. It’s not just chipmaking anymore; it’s the high-wire act that keeps the modern world running.
More Than The Machine
If you're like me, you might be wondering: what’s stopping someone from creating another TSMC if it’s mainly about the machines? After all, can’t another company just buy the same equipment and start printing chips? The short answer is: not even close. While ASML’s extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines are the crown jewels of modern chipmaking, simply acquiring them doesn’t unlock the magic. These machines are only one piece of an immensely complex ecosystem that TSMC has spent decades perfecting. First, export controls, especially from the U.S. and its allies, have restricted access to the most advanced ASML systems, blocking countries like China from obtaining them. But even companies that can buy EUV tools quickly realize that using them effectively is another mountain entirely. TSMC has spent years refining not just the hardware, but the intricate processes, software stacks, materials science, and human expertise needed to integrate EUV into high-volume production with consistently high yields. The machine itself is merely a starting point. What matters is how it’s calibrated, supported, and woven into a choreography of hundreds of interdependent, ultra-sensitive steps. Recreating that level of precision and reliability is like trying to duplicate a symphony just because you own the same violin; it’s not just the instrument; it’s the mastery behind it. And TSMC is the world’s most practiced conductor.
Making it Happen
TSMC’s ability to manufacture chips with such staggering complexity is not just a feat of engineering; it’s a matter of philosophy. As transistor sizes have shrunk to near-molecular scales, much of the world has begun to question whether Moore’s Law can continue. Each new node demands fresh innovation: new materials, new transistor structures, new photolithography techniques that test the limits of light and matter. The company doesn’t chase glory or headlines; instead, it refines, calibrates, and executes, day after day, wafer after wafer. It invests tens of billions in R&D and tooling not just to stay ahead, but to stay on schedule, as if Moore’s Law weren’t just a theory, but a contract with the future.
And that schedule isn’t just TSMC’s problem; it belongs to the world. If TSMC misses a milestone, Apple can’t launch the next iPhone on time. If yields falter, NVIDIA’s GPUs ship late, AI models train slower, data centers fall behind, and product roadmaps around the globe begin to buckle. The entire tech stack, from consumer devices to national defense systems, is now tied to the precision of TSMC’s timeline. That’s why the company’s culture emphasizes discipline over flash, execution over ego. Engineers work long hours not because they are told to, but because they understand the weight of the work. Every process is scrutinized, every failure investigated, every improvement institutionalized. The goal isn’t perfection, it’s progress, repeated at scale. Leadership fosters a sense of quiet duty, not showmanship. As founder Morris Chang once put it, “Without manufacturing, there is no innovation.” To TSMC, chipmaking isn’t just a service; it’s the physical realization of the world’s best ideas. Moore’s Law may no longer feel automatic, but in Hsinchu, it’s still treated as a living challenge. And TSMC, more than anyone else, is holding the line.
Future
TSMC’s future is anchored in relentless innovation and strategic expansion. The company is aggressively investing in next-generation chip technologies, pushing beyond the 3-nanometer node toward 2-nanometer and exploring new materials like graphene and advanced transistor designs. These breakthroughs aim to deliver chips that are not only smaller and faster but also far more energy-efficient, meeting the soaring demands of AI, 5G networks, autonomous vehicles, and beyond. In parallel, TSMC is pioneering advanced packaging techniques, such as chip stacking and heterogeneous integration, which combine multiple types of chips into a single system, unlocking new levels of performance and versatility. Environmental responsibility is also gaining focus, with efforts to minimize water usage, energy consumption, and carbon emissions in its fab operations. As technology accelerates and the world grows more connected, TSMC’s mission remains clear: to stay ahead of the curve and continue powering the innovations that define our future.
Summary
TSMC, or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, began in 1987 as a radical idea: a chipmaker that wouldn’t design its chips but manufacture them for others. Founded by Morris Chang with backing from the Taiwanese government, the company was built to serve a wave of fabless innovators who had big ideas but couldn’t afford billion-dollar fabs. In its early years, TSMC focused relentlessly on precision and reliability, gradually attracting major clients like Broadcom, Qualcomm, and NVIDIA. Its breakthrough came in the 2010s, when it began pulling ahead of rivals like GlobalFoundries, UMC, and even Intel, which struggled with delays and manufacturing issues.
TSMC became the default partner for cutting-edge designs, and tech giants followed: Apple moved iPhone chip production to TSMC, AMD entrusted its comeback chips to them, and Qualcomm, NVIDIA, MediaTek, and others joined in. As the only foundry consistently delivering advanced nodes, from 7nm to 3nm, it now produces over 90% of the world’s most advanced chips. But that dominance also made Taiwan, where TSMC is based, a geopolitical flashpoint, especially amid U.S.-China tensions.
To reduce global risk, TSMC began building new fabs in the U.S., Japan, and Germany. But replicating its tightly knit Hsinchu ecosystem proved difficult. In Arizona, it faced labor shortages, cultural friction, and delays, but responded with local hiring, global training, and supply chain development.
TSMC’s success isn’t just about having the right machines, like ASML’s EUV lithography tools, but about decades of accumulated expertise, process control, and cultural discipline. The company treats Moore’s Law as a living promise and works tirelessly to deliver each node on schedule. Its chips now underpin everything from smartphones to AI to defense systems.
Looking ahead, TSMC is pushing toward 2nm technology, advanced packaging, and greener manufacturing. As the world grows more reliant on semiconductors, TSMC isn’t just a factory; it’s the quiet force shaping the future of technology.
Please leave a comment on what you thought of the summary and how I can improve on it for future reference!
Disclaimer: There could be errors in this post/email. I try my best to minimize mistakes, but I know I’m not perfect, and the internet is not always accurate. This post is not financial advice.
This was a really great article -- I learned a lot about TSMC and the microchip industry. Thanks for your work putting it altogether.
I also echo the comments below about worker safety. Sometimes the margins that come from outsourcing directly hit labor & safety compliance, so I hope that there will be innovation in regards to those aspects to ensure both safety and as you say, better environmental standards as we move forward.
Wow! This really brings to life the fragility of global economy that rests on the future of AI.